The Slovak authority organizes Open Talks in Bratislava to discuss data protection
The Czech data protection authority participated in a meeting with its Central European counterparts to exchange on their respective practices.
On October 20, a meeting entitled "Open Talks" was held in Bratislava under the aegis of the Slovak data protection authority. It brought together representatives of professional associations of data protection officers and supervisory authorities from the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Poland, Hungary, and Austria. Topics discussed included the recording of security breaches, the control of subcontracting chains by controllers, the application of the domestic exemption, and artificial intelligence models. The vice-president of the Czech Office for Personal Data Protection (UOOU) presented his institution's practice regarding the exemption for domestic activities provided for in Article 2, paragraph 2, point c) of the GDPR. He notably detailed the authority's position on video surveillance systems used by natural persons to protect their homes. On this subject, it was specified that the UOOU prioritizes allocating its resources to examining systemic issues affecting a large number of data subjects, considering that neighborhood disputes primarily fall within the jurisdiction of civil courts.
On October 20, a meeting entitled "Open Talks" was held in Bratislava under the aegis of the Slovak data protection authority. It brought together representatives of professional associations of data protection officers and supervisory authorities from the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Poland, Hungary, and Austria. Topics discussed included the recording of security breaches, the control of subcontracting chains by controllers, the application of the domestic exemption, and artificial intelligence models. The vice-president of the Czech Office for Personal Data Protection (UOOU) presented his institution's practice regarding the exemption for domestic activities provided for in Article 2, paragraph 2, point c) of the GDPR. He notably detailed the authority's position on video surveillance systems used by natural persons to protect their homes. On this subject, it was specified that the UOOU prioritizes allocating its resources to examining systemic issues affecting a large number of data subjects, considering that neighborhood disputes primarily fall within the jurisdiction of civil courts.
Informations complémentaires
L’analyse complète est réservée aux membres
Montant de la sanction, thèmes, secteurs, entités et données concernées : l’essai gratuit de 14 jours ouvre la fiche entière et la veille personnalisée.
Essayer gratuitement 14 jours · accès complet · sans carte bancaire